SSTS Permitting
Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection # CI-2021-2633, Submission # Submission-2021-2821, UID # 34002
Status: System Replaced
Status: System Replaced
System Status
| System status on date: | 06/02/2021 | System Status: | Noncompliant |
System - Noncompliant
| Reason(s) for noncompliance: | Tank Integrity (Compliance Component #2) - Failing to protect groundwater Soil Separation (Compliance Component #4) - Failing to protect groundwater |
Property Information
| Property Information: | |||||||||||||||||
| Owner's representative: |
|
||||||||||||||||
[
]
[ Search Result Limit: Impact on Public Health
| System discharges sewage to the ground surface: |
No | System discharges sewage to drain tile or surface waters: |
No | System causes sewage backup into dwelling or establishment: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Searched for surface outlet Searched for seeping in yard/backup into home Homeowner testimony (See Comments/Explanation) |
Tank Integrity
| System consists of seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, or leaching pit: |
Yes |
| Sewage tank(s) leak below their designed operating depth: |
Yes |
| Verification method(s): | Probed tank(s) bottom |
| Comments/Explanation: | Reviewed septic system records on file with Washington County. Probed tanks, soft bottom cesspool drywell with approx 6.5' of liquid depth. |
Other Compliance Conditions
| Maintenance hole covers are damaged, cracked, unsecured, or appear to be structurally unsound: |
No |
| Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety: |
No |
| System is non protective of groundwater for other conditions as determined by the inspector: |
No |
Date of Install
| Date of install known: | Yes |
| Date of installation: | 06/19/1973 |
Soil Separation
| Shoreland/Wellhead Protection/Food, beverage, lodging? | No |
| Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock: |
No |
| Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Conducted soil observation(s) (Attach boring logs) |
| A. Bottom of distribution media: | 5 Decimal Feet |
| B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock: | 5.5 Decimal Feet |
| C. System separation: | .5 Decimal Feet |
| D. Required compliance separation: | 2 Decimal Feet |
Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP
| Is system operating under an Operating Permit: | No |
| Is the system required to employ Nitrogen BMP: | No |
Comments and File Attachments
| Attach Files: |
9646_Stonebridge_Trail_N_comp_report.pdfCertification
| Inspector: |
Please search for and choose SELF/OTHER if what you need does not appear in the list
|
| Inspector Email Address: | tomtrooien@aol.com |
Terms
Certification
By submitting this form I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of the future
system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate
maintenance, or future water usage
Invoice #6850 (06/02/2021)
| Charge | Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| added 06/02/2021 5:13 PM $47 Flat Fee |
$42.00 | x 1 | $42.00 |
| Grand Total | |||
| Total | $42.00 | ||
| Payment 06/02/2021 | $42.00 | ||
| Due | $0.00 | ||
Action: Print
Approvals
| Approval | Signature | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Tom Trooien - 06/02/2021 5:13 PM ed7c487548da36b93becfa391cf77a05 8724f2a898dd9bc0b91ed41725cb731c | |
| #1 Compliance Inspection Accepted | Sarah Borrell - 06/23/2021 3:05 PM 8eb84ba1e1dabc7795bed5e2f3dc8152 4974317e6692572167f008a04850ade4 |
Inspection has been approved. All signatures have been obtained.
| Text: | |
| File(s): |
| Text: | 4/8 SB- left Melissa a vm that system failed due to drywell, cesspool and separation. Asked her to give me her email so I can forward her the report and to call back with questions. Spoke with Melissa again on 4/12, she wanted to know what parts failed. Explained that and let her know she could hire an inspector for a second opinion if she felt the drainfield was compliant, but even if the system may be working it may still be considered noncompliant. She had more questions on the SSTS loan process and wanted me to know their highest interest is getting it compliant and protecting the environment. |
| File(s): |
| Compliance Letter Type: | Failed System, Notice and Order to Comply, Separation | Who's signature should be on the letter? | Sarah Borrell | Permit number to reference in "No Replace" letter: | |
| Was the letter sent? | Yes | Compliant/Non-Compliant: | Noncompliant |
| Certificate of Compliance: |
| Letter of Non-Compliance: |