SSTS Permitting
Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection # CI-2024-3880, Submission # Submission-2024-4095, UID # 52407
Status: Compliance Inspection Accepted
Status: Compliance Inspection Accepted
System Status
| System status on date: | 04/09/2024 | System Status: | Compliant |
Property Information
| Property Information: | |||||||||||||||||
| Owner's representative: |
|
||||||||||||||||
[
]
[ Search Result Limit: Impact on Public Health
| System discharges sewage to the ground surface: |
No | System discharges sewage to drain tile or surface waters: |
No | System causes sewage backup into dwelling or establishment: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Searched for surface outlet Searched for seeping in yard/backup into home Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes |
Tank Integrity
| System consists of seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, or leaching pit: |
No |
| Sewage tank(s) leak below their designed operating depth: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Examined construction records Examined empty (pumped) tank(s) |
| Comments/Explanation: | The tanks were at normal operating level, then were pumped through the maintenance holes. Lowered a light & camera into the empty tanks - bottoms, walls, covers, baffles, risers & maintenance hole covers ok |
Other Compliance Conditions
| Maintenance hole covers are damaged, cracked, unsecured, or appear to be structurally unsound: |
No |
| Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety: |
No |
| System is non protective of groundwater for other conditions as determined by the inspector: |
No |
Date of Install
| Date of install known: | Yes |
| Date of installation: | 04/09/2024 |
Soil Separation
| Shoreland/Wellhead Protection/Food, beverage, lodging? | No |
| Drainfield has at least a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.: |
Yes |
| Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.: |
Yes |
| Verification method(s): | Two previous verifications (Attach boring logs) |
| A. Bottom of distribution media: | 2.7 Decimal Feet |
| B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock: | 6 Decimal Feet |
| C. System separation: | 3.3 Decimal Feet |
| D. Required compliance separation: | 3 Decimal Feet |
Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP
| Is system operating under an Operating Permit: | No |
| Is the system required to employ Nitrogen BMP: | No |
Comments and File Attachments
| Comments or recommendations: | 2nd soil verification attached |
| Attach Files: |
1003020420004-Permit-20030503.PDFCertification
| Inspector: |
Please search for and choose SELF/OTHER if what you need does not appear in the list
|
| Inspector Email Address: | tomtrooien@aol.com |
Terms
Certification
By submitting this form I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of the future
system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate
maintenance, or future water usage
Invoice #10087 (04/09/2024)
| Charge | Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| added 04/09/2024 10:28 AM $47 Flat Fee |
$46.00 | x 1 | $46.00 |
| Grand Total | |||
| Total | $46.00 | ||
| Payment 04/09/2024 | $46.00 | ||
| Due | $0.00 | ||
Action: Print
Approvals
| Approval | Signature | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Tom Trooien - 04/09/2024 10:28 AM 654bc3fcc63afee2a0dd13030db1f705 4940c41620be809777aa5f7c32fe0d1a | |
| #1 Compliance Inspection Accepted | Sarah Borrell - 05/31/2024 4:23 PM eb46e2fe369aef0db6d37074fefebcad d5d197b72c79283ad3075d38abcab485 |
Inspection has been approved. All signatures have been obtained.
| Text: | |
| File(s): |
| Text: | (SB) 5/16 - existing borings submitted did not meet 2 independent parties requirement - I emailed Tom 5/16/24. Tom and I spoke over the phone on 5/31/24, I told him the county would accept anything permitted by WACO staff after 1993. He said if that was accepted by the county then he was comfortable using the 2003 permit approval. I repeated a few times it was completely valid as the Inspector's discretion to do his own set of observation(s). He did not have issue and said he is familiar with the area and it is good, clean sand. I told him I could upload that file for him as he was having trouble. |
| File(s): |
| Compliance Letter Type: | Certificate of Compliance | Who's signature should be on the letter? | Sarah Borrell | Permit number to reference in "No Replace" letter: | |
| Was the letter sent? | Yes | Compliant/Non-Compliant: | Compliant |
| Certificate of Compliance: |
| Letter of Non-Compliance: |