SSTS Permitting
Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection Compliance Inspection # CI-2016-0410, Submission # Submission-2016-0427, UID # 5054
Status: Canceled
Status: Canceled
System Status
| System status on date: | 09/09/2016 | System Status: | Noncompliant |
System - Noncompliant
| Reason(s) for noncompliance: | Soil Separation (Compliance Component #4) - Failing to protect groundwater |
Property Information
| Property Information: | |||||||||||||||||
| Owner's representative: |
|
||||||||||||||||
[
]
[ Search Result Limit: Impact on Public Health
| System discharges sewage to the ground surface: |
No | System discharges sewage to drain tile or surface waters: |
No | System causes sewage backup into dwelling or establishment: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation) |
Comments/Explanation: | See Report |
Tank Integrity
| System consists of seepage pit, cesspool, drywell, or leaching pit: |
No |
| Sewage tank(s) leak below their designed operating depth: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Other methods not listed (See Comments/Explanation) |
| Comments/Explanation: | See Report |
Other Compliance Conditions
| Maintenance hole covers are damaged, cracked, unsecured, or appear to be structurally unsound: |
No |
| Other issues (electrical hazards, etc.) to immediately and adversely impact public health or safety: |
No |
| Explain: | See Report |
| System is non protective of groundwater for other conditions as determined by the inspector: |
No |
| Explain: | See Report |
Date of Install
| Date of install known: | No |
Soil Separation
| Shoreland/Wellhead Protection/Food, beverage, lodging? | Yes |
| Drainfield has at least a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.: |
No |
| Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.: |
No |
| Verification method(s): | Conducted soil observation(s) (Attach boring logs) Other (See Comments/Explanation) |
| Comments/Explanation: | See Report |
| A. Bottom of distribution media: | 0 Decimal Feet |
| B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock: | 0 Decimal Feet |
| C. System separation: | 0 Decimal Feet |
| D. Required compliance separation: | 0 Decimal Feet |
Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP
| Is system operating under an Operating Permit: | No |
| Is the system required to employ Nitrogen BMP: | No |
Comments and File Attachments
| Comments or recommendations: | See Report |
| Attach Files: |
|
245_Dwinnell_Ave.pdfCertification
| Inspector: |
Please search for and choose SELF/OTHER if what you need does not appear in the list
|
| Inspector Email Address: | brian@midwestsoiltesting.com |
Terms
Certification
By submitting this form I hereby certify that all the necessary information has been gathered to determine the compliance status of this system. No determination of the future
system performance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system construction, possible abuse of the system, inadequate
maintenance, or future water usage
Invoice #1383 (09/16/2016)
| Charge | Cost | Quantity | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| added 09/23/2016 12:29 PM $40 Flat Fee |
$40.00 | x 1 | $40.00 |
| Grand Total | |||
| Total | $40.00 | ||
| Payment 09/30/2016 | $40.00 | ||
| Due | $0.00 | ||
This Application was canceled, so you may not pay for this Invoice.
Action: Print
Approvals
| Approval | Signature | Options |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant | Brian Humpal - 09/23/2016 12:29 PM 6cbac6c7ae937854cc38ae8634345a5e 1c06684356a1a16e9395a8ec79a554e9 | |
| #1 Compliance Inspection Accepted | Christopher W. LeClair REHS - 10/05/2016 9:04 AM 4ca44c7087cc5090bed845621c8b3343 95914fdc2ba6ec47b9c41975d3dd8677 |
Inspection has been approved. All signatures have been obtained.
| Text: | |
| File(s): |
| Text: | 4/1 & 4/18 (SB) Dan called in response to NC letter (651-214-6947). 4/19 - city required the inspection and he hired the inspector and has a copy of the report. He kept wanting to know what changed because the system was permitted and inspected, told him the code has not changed but sometimes the system was not installed properly per design, hard to tell what happened and that is just speculation. He said but that is why you have inspectors. Reiterated we did not have a permit record. He doesn't think the County should be involved as the system is in Dellwood and this is not your jurisdiction. Told him I would look into this information and get back to him. On 5/18 (SB) - see attached communication to Inspector. The system is within Dellwood and has been determined out of WACO jurisdiction. Therefore, changed status to 'cancelled'. Due to the extent of communication on this, would like transfer to internal note side of things. |
| File(s): |
|
| Compliance Letter Type: | Who's signature should be on the letter? | Permit number to reference in "No Replace" letter: | |||
| Was the letter sent? | Compliant/Non-Compliant: |
| Certificate of Compliance: |
| Letter of Non-Compliance: |
|